@leashless Have you even READ the minimization? It has an entire section devoted to keeping DOMESTIC cyber data.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Yes,#PRISM is a domestic programme. We have not seen substantial leaks on the non-domestic programmes.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leashless
@leashless I think you're confused. PRISM (702) has had overwhelmingly international successes, at least in terror.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Right, but PRISM is not the gear used for, let's speculate, monitoring the Pakistani SMS networks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leashless
@leashless No. Which is one of many reasons it's not primarily abt terror. But the actual structure of it is now abt cyber, not terror.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I think it's simply we haven't seen data on the other programmes. I can't see PRISM being very good for cyber, frankly.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leashless
@leashless I guess I'm firmly of the belief that they're using it in the ways in which it deviates from the actual law. Which is cyber.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm sure it's being used illegally. Obviously. But cyber... Snowden doesn't mention *anything* to do with TOR or decryption.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leashless
@leashless And how can you say Snowden didn't say anything abt cyber when he leaked PPD on cyberwar showing how comms cooperate?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel hang on, hang on - we're talking about the backdoor into Google, Yahoo etc? Or something else? _which_ doc?7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@leashless Another shows they've added to clause permitting keeping domestic data in case of threat to life threats to property.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.