@emptywheel Just CA. They remanded to 9th Circuit with instructions to reverse. The lack of standing applied there.
-
-
-
@danielmintz Well, has salutary effect of retaining Walker's opinion in toto, but it's gonna have interesting repercussions for referenda -
@emptywheel You mean that if elected don't want to defend them, they're dead? -
@danielmintz May be. -
@emptywheel Kind of seems that way, yeah. Though you still have to win the state court fight.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel Calif only, at best. There will be litigation to try to restrict it to the two couples and/or countiesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel from the opinions, it looks like it's CA+all states that do not specifically disclaim reciprocityThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel it means states can make their own laws...13 of em have already...so its a start.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel only trial court decision remains. So only CA.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel This means the District Court ruling is all that is left. Which applies only in California.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel I think it just applies to California. The SCOTUS ruling has no precedential value. Judgment of 9th Circuit is voided. -->Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good question. RT
@emptywheel So SCOTUS punts on Prop 8, does that mean marriages in just CA, in CA and 1 or 2 other states, or all the 9th?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.