NSA has your phone records for 5 years. But needs 'reasonable articulable suspicion' to search them, provided by a court that never says no.
-
-
@emptywheel but you mean there's debate over the MEANING of 'articulable', not that there isn't SOME affirmation of 'articulable' fact? -
@attackerman Clapper said: "reasonable suspicion, based on specific facts, particular basis for query associated w/foreign terrorist org" -
@emptywheel ahhh you're confusing me. I was reporting what was said in the Alexander hearing. Are you saying I misheard *this* hearing? -
@attackerman No. I'm saying 1) EARLIER colloquy suggested no court review for accessing data, & DiFI didn't say so in statement, -
@emptywheel OK, so you're pointing out an inconsistency between Alexander & Clapper. Right? -
@attackerman Sorry, #2: There's discrepancy bt DiFi's statement and ODNI's 6/6 statement. -
@emptywheel no one does a better job of catching those inconsistencies than you do. -
@attackerman@Richardson_Mich pointed out the "articulable" discrepancy, tho it may be Clapper's effort to dumb down.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@attackerman "2) debate over "articulable." Word most ppl can't pronounce properly much less come to agree on universal def ofThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.