@normative @emptywheel I thought Google participated in the PRISM program, which does deal with content (and formal FISA requests).
-
-
Replying to @BoloBoffin
@BoloBoffin@emptywheel Probably because they don't pull literally EVERYTHING off the wire, and then they need the stored stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative@emptywheel How specific can pulling off wire be? Easier then Google copying PRISM on target's communications?#MyGuess2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BoloBoffin
@BoloBoffin@emptywheel I assume the latter is substantially easier when you know the account.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Go back to Clapper's library metaphor. He's clearly talking packet level. Mentions 1s and 0s.@BoloBoffin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@normative OK, Blarney is packet-level, fishing catch as catch can, but PRISM is "we got your name and probable cause," right?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BoloBoffin
@BoloBoffin But did you see Clapper's library metaphor? http://www.nbcumv.com/mediavillage/networks/nbcnews/pressreleases?pr=contents/press-releases/2013/06/09/nbcnewsexclusiv1370799482417.xml …@normative4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@normative Figuring out which book to pull would be the pattern analysis part. If Clapper's metaphor can go that far.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BoloBoffin
@BoloBoffin He's not admitting to pattern analysis at all yet. Graham's confirmation came after this.@normative1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BoloBoffin Graham DOES at least seem to be talking about fingerprinting for reidentification, not predictive analysis.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative In his revised form, though. @BoloBoffin
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.