@normative It's pretty much universal. We expect those with security clearances to keep our secrets.
-
-
Replying to @DrJJoyner
@DrJJoyner@normative Is there any value that you think would trump the secrecy oath? Any abuses at all that you'd feel obligated to expose?4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @radleybalko
@radleybalko@normative Even there, though, my preference would be to go through channels rather than to press as first resort.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DrJJoyner
@DrJJoyner What channels could one go to? Ron WYden has been pushing this for years, and Clapper lies in response.@radleybalko@normative1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative Normally you'd go to Congress. If Congress authorized this, however, then you're SOL.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @entropy68
@entropy68 Right. But point is Exec is lying publicly as part of Cong debates.@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@entropy68@radleybalko@normative And that's highly problematic. Congress not performing its job; overly deferential to Exec.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DrJJoyner
@DrJJoyner@emptywheel@radleybalko@normative Steven Aftergood has a decent post on this: http://bit.ly/15QfxEg2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @entropy68
@entropy68 Thanks. Great post. My complaints abt Article III go even further.@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@entropy68@radleybalko@normative Judges aren't THAT adversarial to police in ordinary criminal matters. Predisposed to yes.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DrJJoyner No,but defendant will get Art III search in discovery & therefore have standing to challenge @entropy68 @radleybalko @normative
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.