@ggreenwald @seanpaulkelley Feloniously violating one's oath of office is generally frowned upon as a means of creating transparency.
-
-
@emptywheel@entropy68@radleybalko@normative And that's highly problematic. Congress not performing its job; overly deferential to Exec. -
@DrJJoyner@emptywheel@radleybalko@normative Agree. If 3 branches of govt spt program, then there's little choice but to go public. -
@entropy68 Again, Article III is abt antagonistic review. That has NEVER happened. By design.@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative -
@emptywheel@entropy68@radleybalko@normative FISA court consists of sitting Article III judges. Agree they almost always approve, though. -
@DrJJoyner In other words, govt VERY DELIBERATELY doesn't give Google info it'd need to win a challenge.@entropy68@radleybalko@normative
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative If Exec is lying then Congress has authority to correct that if it chooses. -
@entropy68 I guess you're not familiar w/Scott Bloch.@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.