@ggreenwald @seanpaulkelley Feloniously violating one's oath of office is generally frowned upon as a means of creating transparency.
-
-
@emptywheel@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative Normally you'd go to Congress. If Congress authorized this, however, then you're SOL. -
@entropy68 Right. But point is Exec is lying publicly as part of Cong debates.@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative -
@emptywheel@entropy68@radleybalko@normative And that's highly problematic. Congress not performing its job; overly deferential to Exec. -
@DrJJoyner@emptywheel@radleybalko@normative Agree. If 3 branches of govt spt program, then there's little choice but to go public. -
@entropy68 Again, Article III is abt antagonistic review. That has NEVER happened. By design.@DrJJoyner@radleybalko@normative -
@emptywheel@entropy68@radleybalko@normative FISA court consists of sitting Article III judges. Agree they almost always approve, though. -
@DrJJoyner In other words, govt VERY DELIBERATELY doesn't give Google info it'd need to win a challenge.@entropy68@radleybalko@normative
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.