Curious: Why are NatSec hawks always so much more concerned w/leakers than w/China's ability to get THE SAME STUFF at will?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel@seanpaulkelly Short answer is that we can do more about leakers than China.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrJJoyner
@DrJJoyner Also, if our RIVALS know this, then the only people these secrets are being kept from are ... us.@seanpaulkelly2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@seanpaulkelly I'm not comfortable with idiot privates and disgruntled contractors becoming the declassification authority.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrJJoyner
@DrJJoyner@emptywheel@seanpaulkelly Looking at it now, Ellsberg's release looks flat-out quaint & his prosecution absurd.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat@emptywheel@seanpaulkelly Yes. The classification of a history report on Vietnam as Top Secret was clearly absurd.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrJJoyner
@DrJJoyner The classification of the very use of Section 215 to collect all call metadata is likewise absurd.@MikeDrewWhat@seanpaulkelly3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MikeDrewWhat@seanpaulkelly Protecting sources and methods of a ongoing intelligence op is classic case for classification.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@DrJJoyner Calling this an op, while convenient, is a farce (tho one they are using). It is a program. @MikeDrewWhat @seanpaulkelly
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.