@thad_anderson @emptywheel @BuzzFeedBen Fine. But they clearly could have used PRISM as tool to do search
@speechboy71 Other Q us whether additional exposure of USP data is necessary to that monitoring. @thad_anderson @BuzzFeedBen
-
-
@emptywheel@thad_anderson@BuzzFeedBen Agree with both Qs. But that means argument that PRISM didnt play role in Zazi is wrong -
@speechboy71 There may still be defensible case ease is worth exposing USP data, but that's the case at hand@thad_anderson@BuzzFeedBen -
@emptywheel@thad_anderson@BuzzFeedBen Evidence does not say "no." Evidence is unclear -
@speechboy71 Evidence is No. FBI has sworn testimony how they found Zazi in court. Did they lie?@thad_anderson@BuzzFeedBen -
@emptywheel And even if PRISM was decisive in this one case that doesn't necessarily justify program -
@speechboy71 No. Suspect (as@charlie_savage seemed to suggest earlier) PRISM more defensible than 215 mass collection. But should be debate -
@emptywheel@charlie_savage Though I'm not convinced 215 wasn't defensible either, but higher bar for USG -
@speechboy71 Even DiFi doesn't seem sure it has helped at all. And I'm obsessed w/false positives from it.@charlie_savage - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.