@speechboy71 Hard to see how you need what's described in Prism to monitor the known email of a known terror suspect in Pakistan.
-
-
Replying to @BuzzFeedBen
@BuzzFeedBen Maybe I'm confused, but I thought Prism was program that allowed them access to communication btw US and overseas addresses?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 talk to@emptywheel — it is confusing …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuzzFeedBen
@BuzzFeedBen If you read the Gellman piece it sounds like PRISM was very specific targeting.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Moreover, if this traces back to Rogers, then it was 215, not PRISM. But again, not crucial in finding him.@BuzzFeedBen3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@buzzfeedben Especially since we don't know the specifics of PRIM1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 There is nothing, that we know of, that wouldn't have been possible in 1998. This was traditional FISA.@buzzfeedben1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@buzzfeedben Ok, but that doesn't mean that PRISM wasn't used in this case.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 No. But it does mean PRISM was, at most, a snazzy interface that was unnecessary.@buzzfeedben3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@buzzfeedben . . . a scenario where the program was used in this case.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 NYT links to plots (most obviously silly) DiFi Says FAA helped us with. Zazi is not one of them. Why? @buzzfeedben
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.