Hard to see how this is true: “It was through an e-mail correspondence that we had access to only through Prism.” http://nyti.ms/11pUFQQ
-
-
Replying to @BuzzFeedBen
@BuzzFeedBen I'm confused by the argument in your piece. Couldn't PRISM have been used to track Zazi's e-mail traffic?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Hard to see how you need what's described in Prism to monitor the known email of a known terror suspect in Pakistan.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuzzFeedBen
@BuzzFeedBen Maybe I'm confused, but I thought Prism was program that allowed them access to communication btw US and overseas addresses?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 talk to@emptywheel — it is confusing …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuzzFeedBen
@BuzzFeedBen If you read the Gellman piece it sounds like PRISM was very specific targeting.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 There is 0 reason to think tapping specific Pak bomber & through that finding Zazi--w/tips fr Pak--needed PRISM @BuzzFeedBen
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.