Let's stipulate NSA/Verizon is bad/wrong; on what basis are people saying it's illegal? Is it, or is it allowed by Patriot ACT?
-
-
@emptywheel@DanaHoule Such a big data haul? Can't say that's part of an investigation, so in violation of 50 USC § 1861 (b) 2 (A) & (B) -
@papicek Bollocks. The standard is "relevance." Which is interpreted THIS broadly. Also getting hydrogen peroxide purchases.@DanaHoule -
@emptywheel@DanaHoule Uhm, that's what I said, I think. Something that big can't be tied to any suspect in an investigation. -
@papicek But it doesn't require it be tied to a suspect. That's the entire point. Has been debated repeatedly.@DanaHoule -
@emptywheel@DanaHoule That's what the law says. What people say it says, I really don't give a damn about. -
@papicek What language are you referring to? NOTHING requires tie to suspect. Nothing.@DanaHoule -
@emptywheel@DanaHoule ". . . tangible things sought are relevant to an authorized investigation" -
@papicek Yes, "relevant to." Not, "directly connected to." "relevant to means only that they need info for it.@DanaHoule - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@DanaHoule Well, when the NSA does it, that means that it is not illegal.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.