Again: This is a Section 215 order to the FBI, not NSA, prolly focused on business customers (Verizon Business Services, not Wireless)
-
-
-
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson Yes. That may be one of MOST significant revelations. it reveals NSA's doing at least storage if not analysis for FBI.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson Also debunks all the assertions from NSA that they are not collecting info on Americans; all about overseas3 replies 3 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Richardson_Mich
@Richardson_Mich That's why I think FBI/NSA distinction here may be critical. FBI asks for data, NSA gets it. Who collects in that case?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Richardson_Mich What would the significance of that be, since presumption has been that the searching is the issue?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson But I've always wondered whether 215 used as early as 2004 to get around restrictions on DOD.@Richardson_Mich1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Pret-ty freakin' brilliant.@Richardson_Mich1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson@emptywheel or to continue the collection that was supposedly restricted during the comey-ashcroft-hospital showdown2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Richardson_Mich Right. That's my theory. 3/23/04 Mueller & Cheney meet, 3/24 FBI refers to recent changes bypassing OIPR @RachelBLevinson
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.