@ggreenwald Except they do all the time when acting as REPORTERS. Here they are principals, not reporters.
-
-
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos They're lobbyists. Are you advocating lobbyists should have protected secrecy?@ggreenwald1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ggreenwald So they are lobbyists as opposed to reporters? Glenn, how does that affect your analysis?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos You didn't answer my question: are you advocating for protected secrecy for lobbyists?@ggreenwald1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ggreenwald I'm not. I guess the question is are the media orgs "lobbying" here? Or asking legitimate questions abt DOJ policy?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos But why should DOJ 1) get to have convo with select (official?) media, 2) have it in way to avoid accountability?@ggreenwald1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ggreenwald I find the "select" complaint more compelling. Who are the NYT et al to "speak" for all media? Different argument.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@armandodkos Not different in my book. Utterly related. It's all about info asymmetry. @ggreenwald
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.