"near certainty" as a std to avoid civilian casualties must be higher than the law of armed conflict requires, right?
@davidakaye I don't know but I'm weary of the claim given the many times Admin figures have claimed as much on record. @SarahKnuckey
-
-
@emptywheel@SarahKnuckey if it's some standard other than what's in IHL, existing targeting manuals (like FM 3-60) may be up for revision.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@SarahKnuckey and if it's tantamount to what's in IHL, then it's kinda meaningless, or worse. -
@davidakaye@emptywheel On paper, far more restrictive than IHL. New rule does not seem to allow a civ cas proportionality assessment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.