Does "not specifically targeted" mean: intentional collateral damage; inadvertent collateral damage; or a form of signature strike?
-
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Such precise and careful wording. So utterly opaque.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @SarahKnuckey
@SarahKnuckey Amazing precision to discuss something they'd LIKE to pretend was an accident, huh?
0 replies
1 retweet
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.