@CK_MacLeod Particularly given that Holder's recusal hasn't been clean. Again, not saying malice. Saying unforced error.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel so where does it say that the AG's recusal or delegation is any less a recusal or delegation because "not written down"?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod You're missing my point. There have been (in the Libby case) and surely will be challenges based on delegations.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod That's assuming they end up prosecuting someone.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat and presumes similarity or relevant parallel in reason for argument@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod Actually, there's plenty of evidence to support argument DOJ violated guidelines--far more than in Libby@MikeDrewWhat2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel still presumes eventual or projected case even roughly similar to Libby, turning on this ? - fact not in evidence@MikeDrewWhat1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod Sure. It'll only happen if DOJ charges someone having relied on this info. That's not Libby tho.@MikeDrewWhat1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod If they IDs person using it but built case completely not using it, where wld such a case stand?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod ...Meaning didn't present the records as evidence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MikeDrewWhat Poison fruit. DOJ has ALREADY said they had no other way to identify suspect. @CK_MacLeod
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.