still see no indication of legal violation by Holder on this matter - everything else seems opinion @jamespoulos @emptywheel @nycsouthpaw
-
-
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod I'm not saying legal violation or malice. I'm saying it puts subpoenas at risk, and maybe case@jamespoulos@nycsouthpaw1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel do you have a specific statute in mind other than the one highlighted by@nycsouthpaw? cc@jamespoulos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod Point is that anyone can now challenge whether 50.10 has been met. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/50.10 …@nycsouthpaw@jamespoulos1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel statute seems to say nothing on manner or mode of recusal/delegation by AG@nycsouthpaw@jamespoulos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod Particularly given that Holder's recusal hasn't been clean. Again, not saying malice. Saying unforced error.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel so where does it say that the AG's recusal or delegation is any less a recusal or delegation because "not written down"?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@CK_MacLeod All the more so given, for example, Holder reviewed letter from Cole to AP.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.