still see no indication of legal violation by Holder on this matter - everything else seems opinion @jamespoulos @emptywheel @nycsouthpaw
@CK_MacLeod You're missing my point. There have been (in the Libby case) and surely will be challenges based on delegations.
-
-
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod That's assuming they end up prosecuting someone. -
@MikeDrewWhat and presumes similarity or relevant parallel in reason for argument@emptywheel -
@CK_MacLeod Actually, there's plenty of evidence to support argument DOJ violated guidelines--far more than in Libby@MikeDrewWhat -
@emptywheel still presumes eventual or projected case even roughly similar to Libby, turning on this ? - fact not in evidence@MikeDrewWhat -
@CK_MacLeod Sure. It'll only happen if DOJ charges someone having relied on this info. That's not Libby tho.@MikeDrewWhat -
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod If they IDs person using it but built case completely not using it, where wld such a case stand? -
@MikeDrewWhat Well, it'd be hard to argue that since to even get records, they had to maintain they couldn't get info other way@CK_MacLeod -
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod Once you know the person, there might be all sorts of ways to develop non-pen registry evidence, no? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.