still see no indication of legal violation by Holder on this matter - everything else seems opinion @jamespoulos @emptywheel @nycsouthpaw
-
-
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod I'm not saying legal violation or malice. I'm saying it puts subpoenas at risk, and maybe case@jamespoulos@nycsouthpaw1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel do you have a specific statute in mind other than the one highlighted by@nycsouthpaw? cc@jamespoulos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CK_MacLeod
@CK_MacLeod So I'm not saying Holder will go to jail. I'm saying no-doc will at least open up case to challenges they tried to avoid w/AP.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod But challenge to what? Presumably they've gotten what they want from the records by now...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat Right. But say you're charged using evidence fr AP records. Then you challenge that as poisonous fruit.@CK_MacLeod1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod Ah, okay, gotcha. I thought you were saying as part of an AP action of some sort relating directly to the seizure.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MikeDrewWhat I think AP may well challenge it, but DOJ has already absconded with the barn door, as you note. @CK_MacLeod
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.