still see no indication of legal violation by Holder on this matter - everything else seems opinion @jamespoulos @emptywheel @nycsouthpaw
@CK_MacLeod Point is that anyone can now challenge whether 50.10 has been met. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/50.10 … @nycsouthpaw @jamespoulos
-
-
@emptywheel statute seems to say nothing on manner or mode of recusal/delegation by AG@nycsouthpaw@jamespoulos -
@CK_MacLeod Particularly given that Holder's recusal hasn't been clean. Again, not saying malice. Saying unforced error. -
@emptywheel so where does it say that the AG's recusal or delegation is any less a recusal or delegation because "not written down"? -
@CK_MacLeod You're missing my point. There have been (in the Libby case) and surely will be challenges based on delegations. -
@emptywheel@CK_MacLeod That's assuming they end up prosecuting someone. -
@MikeDrewWhat and presumes similarity or relevant parallel in reason for argument@emptywheel -
@CK_MacLeod Actually, there's plenty of evidence to support argument DOJ violated guidelines--far more than in Libby@MikeDrewWhat -
@emptywheel still presumes eventual or projected case even roughly similar to Libby, turning on this ? - fact not in evidence@MikeDrewWhat - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.