On a hyper literal reading, no parallel notice obligation for e-mail transactional records?
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative I'm still not convinced wasn't done w/NSL, which they say is not a subpoena and therefore doesn't have to comply w/any of those1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The fact that they got a letter from a U.S. attorney suggests a plain old subpoena.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
.
@normative And that appears confirmed now, with Holder's reference to Dep AG ordering it under proper guidelines.@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AriMelber
@AriMelber Where in that statement do they say teh word "subpoena"? They don't. Use of NSLs w/journos in NatSec complies w/DIOG.@normative1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Understood, but would the Dep AG be in a role of deciding that, normally?@normative2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@AriMelber DAG is one of the people who could approve NSLs. It does required heightened authority, but not AG. @normative
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.