No one at the AP seems to have heard from DOJ prior to this notification, which is why it’s weird — is just asking for them “reasonable”?
-
-
Replying to @marcambinder
@marcambinder One other point I think people are not curious enough about: Why DC and not EDVA, if UndieBomb was CIA op?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@marcambinder because court issuing subpoena is based on location of person/entity being subpoenaed2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlexaMRomero
@AlexaMRomero Op was ostensibly CIA, which would make it an EDVA investigation, normally.@marcambinder1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@marcambinder ah. i think machen appointed as spec prosecutor, bc rosenstein of d.md was as well. not unusual see pat fitzgerald1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@AlexaMRomero But Rosenstein was proper jurisdiction for investigation: NSA=MD. Proper for claimed leak here would be EDVA. @marcambinder
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.