In 2011, FBI was opening ~1787 CT/CI assessments/mo. How much time would it take to call ALL relevant PDs on them? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/us/24fbi.html …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel @AllThingsHLS I have another question, too. FBI had limited investigatory authority. Would Boston PD have had more?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel @AllThingsHLS Well, the NY Times reporting speaks to Boston PD rather than Cambridge: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/us/boston-police-werent-told-fbi-got-warning-on-tsarnaev.html …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@DaveedGR No unaddressed CT leads per Director. All see something/say something leads entered into eGuardian & opened as assessm1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AllThingsNatSec
@AllThingsHLS But wasnt' this was assessed? But not entered into eGuardian for f-up?
@DaveedGR1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@DaveedGR Not entered into eGuardian b/c it was 163 FPC case not CT.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AllThingsNatSec
@AllThingsHLS OK, thanks. Even I need a Venn diagram of all the databases to understand, and Congress DEFINITELY does.
@DaveedGR1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@DaveedGR There are so many databases that even I would have difficulty describing them all with particularity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@AllThingsHLS They DO classify lists of them all, much less Venn diagrams of them. Gonna check DIOG to see what's unclass in it. @DaveedGR
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.