-
-
Replying to @stcolumbia
@stcolumbia@caidid no, it wasn't, but how close was it to being one given the (over)reaction by authorities to limit activity of 1M people?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stcolumbia
@stcolumbia@Galrahn so obviously the request was only for the period of the search of the area where they believed him to be.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stcolumbia
@stcolumbia@caidid shelter in place in Watertown made sense. For expanded area? Even if they caught him during SIP that was bad policy IMO.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stcolumbia
@stcolumbia so you don't see this as a bad precedent?@caidid1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stcolumbia
@stcolumbia FYI. The feds are unhappy, but they are right to stay quiet. Not their call, jurisdiction is local.@caidid4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.