@Susan_Hennessey And you keep ignoring fact that the amateurs you see as all-powerful self-corrected before "pros" did.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Self-correction means different things between LE and Internet forums. LE doesn't blast unverified info, then say "nevermind."3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Also, your use of word "blast" suggests a media-influence model you have not yet laid out.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel is the damaging part then agree to disagree. LE certianly fallible in crises. My belief is Reddit/4chan made their jobs harder.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey And you clearly brought that belief to bear on your selective interpretation of the WaPo article.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Even choice of what artl to tweet is selective, selective forum. I noted LE quoted position. Find it interesting and probable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey You noted (ultimately) first few words of a sentence, ignored last half of sentence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Which sentence? Quoted one? I think entire article/rest of quoted paragraph (and those before and after) support same point.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey I understand that. I also noted that entire article is abt MEDIA actions in response to crowd source.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel But it is also about LE actions in response to crowd source.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey Yes. If you squint really hard and ignore the rest that is precisely what that article says.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.