On 2011 DOJ admin change to allow extended questioning of terror suspects w/out Miranda. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704050204576218970652119898.html … Unclear if court will agree.
-
-
Replying to @jenvalentino
@jenvalentino@bobblakley retweeted a link to http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-mied-2_10-cr-20005/pdf/USCOURTS-mied-2_10-cr-20005-3.pdf …, a precedent for delaying Miranda warnings. There is SCOTUS precedent.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveBellovin
@SteveBellovin@bobblakley I was getting to that! Still not clear where the line gets drawn, as far as I can tell. But I'm no expert.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jenvalentino
@jenvalentino@bobblakley In http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/467/649 … SCOTUS ok'd "need for answers .. in a situation posing a threat to the public safety"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveBellovin
@SteveBellovin@bobblakley Right. I'm just saying suppose you question someone for days? Can you still claim the public safety exemption?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jenvalentino As I've said, Shahzad was questioned for 2 weeks w/o lawyer, w/family in custody, and probably undergoing sleep deprivation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.