@emptywheel @JimWhiteGNV Willman's book puts a lot more flesh on the narrative, but I'm sure you'd reject it regardless, so let's drop this.
@nomoremister @JimWhiteGNV is a biologist. He was unimpressed. And I'm mostly unimpressed by an arg so based on obvious conflicts.
-
-
-
@nomoremister It's not the flesh that's on the narrative. It's that it offers no evidence FOR Ivins and ignores tons of evidence against. -
@emptywheel i'd say "Read the book," but I know you won't. So enough. -
@nomoremister I HAVE read signifiant parts of it. Bought it from google. As I said, no evidence for, lots of blind spots of problems.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.