@benjaminwittes Just because you haven't done the research doesnt' mean a quote is fiction.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm perplexed by this. I have no doubt he has said other things you would find objectionable. But I don't see how that bears...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@emptywheel … on whether a particular quote is authentic or not.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes So you won't guarantee publishing a best hits at Lawfare, huh?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Have fun with it--on your own blog. I'll respond to it on@lawfareblog.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes So you're not confident in your own purported reading, I take it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm confident of my reading. I'm just not interested in using Lawfare to compound the problem I was seeking to address.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes Which you shouldn't. Either evidence is ALL, mysteriously, wrong JUST as pertains Fredman, or you shouldn't have confidence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel But I didn't make any claims about Fredman. YOU did. I simply claimed that a particular quotation is very likely fictitious.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@emptywheel If you have a case to make, make it...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@benjaminwittes I will, however, make it clear that you refuse to back your own professed certainty.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.