@emptywheel …he did and said, that's fair game. But that's not why his name keeps showing up in book after book, article after article.
-
-
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes Sure, but quote is consistent with TONS of other things, including from other sources. So this once he wasn't a shit?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I know of no instance in which he is on the record being consistent with that quote.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes Just because you haven't done the research doesnt' mean a quote is fiction.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm perplexed by this. I have no doubt he has said other things you would find objectionable. But I don't see how that bears...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@emptywheel … on whether a particular quote is authentic or not.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes So you won't guarantee publishing a best hits at Lawfare, huh?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Have fun with it--on your own blog. I'll respond to it on@lawfareblog.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes So you're not confident in your own purported reading, I take it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm confident of my reading. I'm just not interested in using Lawfare to compound the problem I was seeking to address.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@benjaminwittes You're not confident enough in your purported reading to back your claims about Fredman. You DON'T trust yourself.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.