Hm. Holder's answer does seem to blur the distinction between "combatants" and people "actively engaged in combat". http://j.mp/14Cecia
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative but isn't Paul's articulation in that post narrower than Justice's, and thus all to the good that Holder widened the scope?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianbeutler
@brianbeutler How is it narrower. Key detail of Admin's "imminence" definition is doesn't require past or immediate action. This seems same2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm taking "actively engaged" as a subset of "engaged." Mainly agree with@bmaz that this is all "fool's gold" anyhow.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @brianbeutler
@brianbeutler Yeah. I see that, guess it makes sense.
8:05 AM - 8 Mar 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.