Hm. Holder's answer does seem to blur the distinction between "combatants" and people "actively engaged in combat". http://j.mp/14Cecia
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative but isn't Paul's articulation in that post narrower than Justice's, and thus all to the good that Holder widened the scope?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianbeutler
@brianbeutler How is it narrower. Key detail of Admin's "imminence" definition is doesn't require past or immediate action. This seems same2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Paul says "actively engaged," Holder says "engaged." Seems like Holder's saying there's wider category of people we can't kill.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Replying to @brianbeutler
@brianbeutler Correction, for starters. This is not "can't kill." It's "can't kill w/weaponized drone." Pretty clear we can kill people.
7:56 AM - 8 Mar 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.