So strike down DOMA, but not uphold the right of all people to marry, is that it?
@Harrydoesntmind I get that--that's why I said that DOMA is clearly unconstitutional, cause I get rights gay people don't.
-
-
@emptywheel just read your post. Well, if the position was good enough for the most liberal justice on the 9th Cir, why not for the SG? -
@Harrydoesntmind@bmaz wrote that, not me. We'll see. -
@emptywheel@bmaz I don't think any ban on same sex marriage could withstand intermediate scrutiny; a high standard the same as for gender -
@Harrydoesntmind@emptywheel ..now, is it? -
@bmaz@emptywheel The reasoning suggested by the SG matters. Intermediate scrutiny is sweeping. Calling it half assed doesn't change that. -
@Harrydoesntmind@emptywheel Really? How do you reconcile full intermediate scrutiny language w/support only for "8 state solution"?? -
@bmaz@emptywheel Basically SG is saying Prop 8 is invalid under Romer, and oh, by the way intermediate scrutiny applies. That's a big deal. -
@Harrydoesntmind@emptywheel ...But you will not change my mind. I will stand with what I have said. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel As you noted, it is crafty. It also may move the ball in a forward direction in a very conservative court.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel well I guess we are both happy today, as the SG did support the challenge to Prop 8Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.