People commenting on Obama's targeted killing suggest he's doing it ONLY under AUMF, not Article II. That's not true. http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/02/18/the-aumf-fallacy/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Nice work. I think that unless the argument is the Posse Comitatus Act is unconstitutional under Art. II, my analysis holds.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos Especially why would you assume that when it wasn't the military that killed Anwar al-Awlaki?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The CIA question. CIA used to be barred from domestic activity. Have to admit not sure if Patriot Act et al changed that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos What stops FBI, under "imminent threat" doctrine, from killing domestically, on orders of President?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel imo, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos But the white paper clearly says that imminent threat overrules due process.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The White Paper was addressing outside the US. Posse Comitatus about in US. But the due process is still a valid issue.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@armandodkos 2/2 WP also says, "does not attempt to det min reqs to render lethal op v. US cit lawful in other circumstances."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.