The faux trial that Feinstein & Brennan gave Anwar Awlaki today (with no evidence) was the only trial they gave him--and it was posthumous
@MikeDrewWhat You're WAY overestimating the substance of what Hasan was saying. In part, he was asking for help to find wife.
-
-
@emptywheel >contained no opertaive info, that is a different point to make abt them than that he ignored them, defined as not rplyg/fwding. -
@MikeDrewWhat He replied to 2 of something like 18 emails. The ones that offered him fame. The rest were ignored. -
@emptywheel I.e. if he had received an instruction from an AQ assoc. to detonate a bomb, would it matter if he "ignored" it by not replying? -
@MikeDrewWhat I get what you're saying. But it is so far outside the scope of these pathetic emails as to be meaningless. -
@emptywheel I totally didn't know what was in them, in fact I'd lost track in DiFi's litany who sent them. Was just responding to your arg. -
@MikeDrewWhat And my arg was based on how far out of reasonableness DiFi's statements were , based on having read emails. -
@emptywheel Sorry abt all that. I really did think what you were saying was that what mattered was that he didn't send an email back. -
@MikeDrewWhat No. I'm saying that the entire exchange is published and after reading it it is very clear Awlaki was blowing Hasan off. - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel No, I'm not. You could use this argument (ignored) regarding info relating operative info. If your claim is the these emails >>Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.