@emptywheel ...While, yes, you need lots of detail to say whether a particular action is legal. For now, I'm asking abt former.
-
-
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat You still need someone to review claims made. Awlaki was horrible, but there are real problems w/evidence against him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Eh? I'm asking you to make claims - about what the law requires in this area.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat A true imminent threat might be a legitimate target. But someone who maybe involved in attack 20 months earlier not imminent.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel What makes any given target potentially (or more to the point) actually legitimate? Under what laws is it? (Or not.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat Depends. Is Admin acting as law enforcement/Article II? Or military? That's why white paper is so bad.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well there could be multiple legal realities that cld satisfy, so your answer to what must be true wld take the form of "One of>4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MikeDrewWhat I think all the problems fr Awlaki's case--and the WP--stem from fact that DOD tried to kill him when not operational.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.