@DanielLarison But I'm not sure I agree that the decision must be reviewed by a court.
@MikeDrewWhat If Separation of powers had been respected, we'd have a better idea of whether Awlaki's treatment was just.
-
-
@emptywheel Perhaps problem is our interest is different. At some level I care abt justice for him, but first I care about *legality*. -
@MikeDrewWhat I care about constitutionality first. Justice for Awlaki, not so much. Abdulrahman and Samir Khan, much more so. -
@emptywheel Uh, okay. So why did you choose to talk abt justice when I too was asking abt minimum legal requirements? -
@MikeDrewWhat I'm suggesting that we can't get to your issues--legality--w/o first getting real info, which comes thru SoP. -
@emptywheel >> have to provide your view on those questions just on the basic requirements of the law if you don't want to. But if you want> -
@MikeDrewWhat I think you do need more detail. After all, 1st attempt on Awlaki not legal under the White Paper standards, according to IC. -
@emptywheel You don't need any detail to say what the requirements of the law in general are.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.