@emptywheel If Ad. believes BOTH AUMF *&* a hypoth. MON for CIA action justified Awlaki action, is it the case there is one justification >>
-
-
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat To clarify: MON not hypothetical, Admin made THAT clear in FOIA fight. Woodward & others reported it covered targeted killing6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Again, reason I used "hypo" just comes from wording of even your most recent posts: so many words like "hint," "hinting," >>2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat So if they used C-i-C, that may be it, which makes it worse. (Awlaki killing may not have met terms of known OLC memo)4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Only reason can think to broach Art II just. 4 Awlaki is if internally ad. thot AUMF *didn't* cover. May be missing factors tho.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeDrewWhat
@MikeDrewWhat They tried to kill Awlaki at least 3 times. First time COULDN'T be AUMF. So it may be different just for each time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@MikeDrewWhat I suspect DOJ balked at that original standard, insisted on OLC memo.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.