@grumpybozo Now I do! I asked bc CERT was doing flow analysis, but USG was planning on keeping them away from trial http://is.gd/CR4V7V
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Gotta be careful about “CERT”. US-CERT is not CMU CERT. But they are friendly. Lots of IT security folks are friendly with LEOs3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo And then there's the question why _MIT_ would have to go to CMU? Or is that the problem you're referencing? ;p1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I have not dug into the docs to understand that detail. Are you sure they went to CMU CERT and not to their own internal CERT?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo "“CERT” ... refers to CM computer response team which provides assistance to USSS with complex computer & internet issues"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo Doesn't that refer not JUST to forensics on the laptop, but the earlier access through the login. (Refers to other computers)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Yes. flow is flow. On MIT wires. I’m guessing they took their problem here: http://www.cert.org/forensics/1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo tho this seems to suggest JSTOR, at least, didn't notice anything in that Nov-Dec period, until Jan 3. http://is.gd/VdDARY1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel More likely the JSTOR admins who blocked all of MIT got a scolding from mgmt, told to give MIT time to fix their problem.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@grumpybozo Anyway, thanks. Off to bed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.