@grumpybozo ...3) there are indications they were fishing for other information. My issues are abt standard law enforcement BS they pulled.
@grumpybozo Now I do! I asked bc CERT was doing flow analysis, but USG was planning on keeping them away from trial http://is.gd/CR4V7V
-
-
@emptywheel Gotta be careful about “CERT”. US-CERT is not CMU CERT. But they are friendly. Lots of IT security folks are friendly with LEOs -
@grumpybozo And then there's the question why _MIT_ would have to go to CMU? Or is that the problem you're referencing? ;p -
@emptywheel I have not dug into the docs to understand that detail. Are you sure they went to CMU CERT and not to their own internal CERT? -
@grumpybozo "“CERT” ... refers to CM computer response team which provides assistance to USSS with complex computer & internet issues" -
@emptywheel So SS brought in help from CERT? -
@grumpybozo Doesn't that refer not JUST to forensics on the laptop, but the earlier access through the login. (Refers to other computers) -
@emptywheel Yes. flow is flow. On MIT wires. I’m guessing they took their problem here: http://www.cert.org/forensics/ -
@grumpybozo tho this seems to suggest JSTOR, at least, didn't notice anything in that Nov-Dec period, until Jan 3. http://is.gd/VdDARY - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.