Disappointing: people chasing the nothingburger of Secret Service working the #AaronSwartz case. Read SS PR’s & 18USC1030, folks. (1/2)
-
-
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo I'm not surprised at all that SS HAS jurisdiction. What is noteworthy is (non)disclosure about when they owned it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel It's not unusual for them to come in at arrest time. They're best at analyzing seized equipment/code not body-chasing2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo ...3) there are indications they were fishing for other information. My issues are abt standard law enforcement BS they pulled.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The LE part seems pretty *normal* to me, not *right* The outliers are MIT and the prosecutor.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo It seems utterly NORMAL for me for DOJ's highly politicized prosecutions. That it involved SS and not FBI is not the issue.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel It’s not unique to politicized prosecutions. It’s only visible in the cases that get pushed. MIT had to be pushing.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo One area where I am curious is how ECTFs work--what is the institutional structure/referral process?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Above my pay grade :) I’ve avoided managerial responsibility studiously for many years.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@grumpybozo Another Q is USG's expectations w/MIT for SARs is. W/all research there, it can't be high, tho this was IT, not research comp.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.