@MiekeEoyang Right. But @Richardson_Mich's link was to FAS, which was clearly limited to SSCI. Basically Reyes better than DiFi and Rogers.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel And he talks about House Judiciary. So, not limited to SSCI. & it isn't complete picture of oversight to only talk 1 chamber.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang & while I agree you can't exclude HPSCI, the judiciary committees inability to affect (for example) FAA or drone memos notable1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Um, at least in House, Judiciary did mark FAA & reauth. They had ability, even tho maybe not outcome some wanted.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang I thought we were talking oversight. Passing a bill that doesn't include it is not, IMO, oversight.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Original FAA was a step up in oversight from what had existed before. Maybe not as far as some would like, but was improvement.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang@emptywheel FAA only happened because NYT made story PUBLIC. Go8 sat on TSP and did nothing while info was kept secret2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Richardson_Mich
@Richardson_Mich@emptywheel It wasn't public reporting (2005) that forced legislative action (2008). If Ds hadn't taken House, no FAA.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MiekeEoyang You're also saying thta if Ds hadn't taken House, Judges on FISC who objected would have had legal grounds to do so.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.