@MiekeEoyang Right. But @Richardson_Mich's link was to FAS, which was clearly limited to SSCI. Basically Reyes better than DiFi and Rogers.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel And he talks about House Judiciary. So, not limited to SSCI. & it isn't complete picture of oversight to only talk 1 chamber.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang & while I agree you can't exclude HPSCI, the judiciary committees inability to affect (for example) FAA or drone memos notable1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Um, at least in House, Judiciary did mark FAA & reauth. They had ability, even tho maybe not outcome some wanted.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang I thought we were talking oversight. Passing a bill that doesn't include it is not, IMO, oversight.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Original FAA was a step up in oversight from what had existed before. Maybe not as far as some would like, but was improvement.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang We'll have to agree to disagree that passing law that rubber stamps illegal program is "a step up" in oversight. It's a farce.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel 1) FISC review (even in secret) is an increase in oversight, 2) protections for US cits abroad is too. Is it perfect? No.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MiekeEoyang And you seem to be overlooking the bit where Congress SANCTIONED illegal activity by immunizing it after the fact.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.