@speechboy71 As the econ stim we'll lose here is too, though most needy have been at it for 3-5 years.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel So your argument is that it would have been better to lose that stimulus 2 years ago? This makes no sense2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 And you're argument is that had we lost that stimulus, nothing would have happened. I don't thikn that's the case.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Actually that's not my argument at all - but I need to move on. Have a good night2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 It's central to your point. It has to be. Otherwise, no reason not to call GOP bluff in 2010 when costs are lower.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Third, I've said repeatedly that not getting stimulus would have contracted economy - other than than you've nailed it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 But your notion is after O doesn't cave to GOP in 2010 ... nothing happens. Even while assuming something will happen now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Lastly, Obama didn't cave. The GOP caved. And I don't know why you keep saying my argument is that "nothing happens"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Until they're cornered. You think O has more leverage now, but ALL YOUR ARGUMENTS demonstrate how much he had then.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@speechboy71 Considering they were convinced to the very end Romney was going to win, I doubt they felt very cornered in 20101 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DanaHoule Look, 1) we disagree what we're dealing w/ 2) we're ignoring that O is the one who chose to move to deficit hawkery in 2010.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.