@speechboy71 Hey, if ALL YOU CARE ABOUT is O reelect, then whoopie! 2010 was not-terrible loss, leading to win against terrible candidate.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Obviously his re-elect does matter and that wasn't even my argument. Rather that econ stim in the deal was actually important1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 As the econ stim we'll lose here is too, though most needy have been at it for 3-5 years.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel So your argument is that it would have been better to lose that stimulus 2 years ago? This makes no sense2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 And you're argument is that had we lost that stimulus, nothing would have happened. I don't thikn that's the case.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Actually that's not my argument at all - but I need to move on. Have a good night2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 It's central to your point. It has to be. Otherwise, no reason not to call GOP bluff in 2010 when costs are lower.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Third, I've said repeatedly that not getting stimulus would have contracted economy - other than than you've nailed it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 But your notion is after O doesn't cave to GOP in 2010 ... nothing happens. Even while assuming something will happen now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@speechboy71 Marcy, he's really not saying if no deal in 2010 nothing happens, he's saying it would have been far worse1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DanaHoule But his assumption is that that far worse would have been tolerated.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.