@speechboy71 THanks for the condescension again. You're clearly NOT engaging bc you seem unwilling to think out of a static box.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I honestly have no idea what that means.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Right. Maybe I'll explain to you how history works when you stop telling me I'm one being partisan bc NOT driven by O reelect.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well I think history is affected in some measure by who won the most recent presidential election2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Hey, if ALL YOU CARE ABOUT is O reelect, then whoopie! 2010 was not-terrible loss, leading to win against terrible candidate.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Obviously his re-elect does matter and that wasn't even my argument. Rather that econ stim in the deal was actually important1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 As the econ stim we'll lose here is too, though most needy have been at it for 3-5 years.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel So your argument is that it would have been better to lose that stimulus 2 years ago? This makes no sense2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 My argument is we're going to lose stimulus at one point. We're losing it now after having lost a lot, PLUS more dangerous GOP.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You have no basis to make that argument - its pure hypothetical. And one that is almost certainly going to be proven wrong1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 As your argument is that nothing would have happened. That's what I mean abt you not getting how history works.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.