@speechboy71 He doesn't get it right away, correct. And a lot else happens bad, which is about to happen bad now, w/worst off worse off.
@speechboy71 Right. Maybe I'll explain to you how history works when you stop telling me I'm one being partisan bc NOT driven by O reelect.
-
-
@emptywheel Well I think history is affected in some measure by who won the most recent presidential election -
@speechboy71 Hey, if ALL YOU CARE ABOUT is O reelect, then whoopie! 2010 was not-terrible loss, leading to win against terrible candidate. -
@emptywheel Obviously his re-elect does matter and that wasn't even my argument. Rather that econ stim in the deal was actually important -
@speechboy71 As the econ stim we'll lose here is too, though most needy have been at it for 3-5 years. -
@emptywheel So your argument is that it would have been better to lose that stimulus 2 years ago? This makes no sense -
@speechboy71 My argument is we're going to lose stimulus at one point. We're losing it now after having lost a lot, PLUS more dangerous GOP. -
@emptywheel You have no basis to make that argument - its pure hypothetical. And one that is almost certainly going to be proven wrong -
@speechboy71 As your argument is that nothing would have happened. That's what I mean abt you not getting how history works.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.