@msupolitical Well, you're applauding that govt told employers that they can't accept certain clauses in their contracts.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel i never said i supported this bill....i said i support individuals rights to bargain separate from unions1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VOLUNTAREE
@msupolitical Well, you accused me of lying when in fact I was stating the facts correctly.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel all forms of (accd to libertarians) contract aren't necessarily, you can't sell yourself or someone else to slavery.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VOLUNTAREE
@msupolitical Sure, but that doesn't mean you didn't accuse me of lying when I was right on the facts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel i said you lied when you said something untrue...#nonunionandproud2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VOLUNTAREE
@msupolitical If freely entered contract stipulates that non-members who benefit fr legal representation pay for JUST THAT rep, then they do
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel so its ok for a contract to stipulate that non parties to the contract owe them?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VOLUNTAREE
@msupolitical So you sound like the kind of guy happy to pay for professional services. You just don't want workers to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Paying for services through a middle man that's holding gun to employers head
@emptywheel3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@msupolitical Employers aren't big boys, and the govt must protect them because they're so weak, that's it?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.