@drgrist Part of that problem is the lack of Obama Admin transparency - but that's a separate issue
-
-
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Fair or not, that means that independent researchers have more credibility than the Admin, on body counts and on effect.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Independent researchers who rely on NGOs that are demonstrably anti-drone?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Look, at this point Brennan is or should be at Rummy levels of credibility. That's not much better than ISI.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I know that you're not really comparing John Brennan to the ISI. Tell me you're not doing that.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Or maybe you just tolerate obviously false bullshit from Brennan but not from your enemies.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No not really. But the ISI's track record is, to say the least, a lot worse1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 No. In this case they are at least making dubious claims. Brennan has repeatedly made demonstrably false ones.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You mean like when they said the TB and AQ have no safe haven in Pakistan. Please5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 When someone makes demonstrably false statements while affirmatively withholding information, they can't be considered credible
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.