@emptywheel comparing Obama to Clinton without bracketing off those things and Obama still comes out better. Who started rendition?
-
-
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer Which is why I objected with the way you initiated this discussion, about "liberal" policies--neither is liberal.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel excluding black people from social security wasn't particularly liberal either but I'm glad social security exists2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer But GIVING social security is different than GIVING terrible private companies captive customers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel and yet like SS, there are obvious things liberals can do to alleviate its worst aspects. Couldn't if it didn't exist.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer And regardless, that doesn't make it a LIBERAL policy. My gripe is in your assertion it is. It's not.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel as I said earlier, it's a conservative means to a liberal end, which is covering more people.4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer@emptywheel Arguably, "covering more people" is a HUMANITARIAM end. Liberal v conservative is about the role of gvt in that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel E.g., Catholics and other churches have been working on the "covering more people" though their charities for years.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.